Stoic Macro: Portfolio Consciousness
Building Positions And A Life That Benefit From Volatility
We've explored the mathematics of progress and the paradox of living between order and chaos. Now let's make it real.
Most people respond to uncertainty in one of two ways: they either hedge everything into mediocrity or bet everything on one vision. Both approaches are wrong.
The existential question from yesterday—when to cut versus when to double down—dissolves when you adopt what I call portfolio consciousness: a way of structuring your life and investments so that you benefit from volatility rather than just surviving it.
The Core Insight
Portfolio consciousness means applying investment thinking to existence itself. You build multiple meaning-structures knowing most will fail, but some might create asymmetric value. You size your bets based on uncertainty rather than conviction. You expect volatility and position to benefit from it.
This isn't defensive nihilism. It's creative materialism—the recognition that since meaning isn't handed to you by the universe, you create it through construction. But since most things break (entropy always wins), you can't stake your entire identity on one construction project.
The Three-Legged Framework
In practice, this creates a framework for both investing and living:
Leg 1: Hedge the Tail
Accept that systems fail. Current monetary policy creates inflation risk. Geopolitical tensions threaten institutional stability. AI disrupts entire industries overnight. So hold some gold and silver—not because you want the world to break, but because portfolio theory demands you hedge tail risks.
This isn't about being a gold bug or a doomer. It's about acknowledging that your base case assumptions might be wrong. When everyone assumes the current system will continue indefinitely, prudent diversification includes assets that benefit if those assumptions break.
My obsession with precious metals as portfolio insurance reflects this: Yes, AI is happening, and yes, you generally want to own equities. But you also need to hedge against rising inflation from conflict, the deterioration of sovereign credibility, and currency debasement.
Leg 2: Capture the Base Case
If things go normally well, own diversified equity exposure. Bet on human ingenuity and economic growth. Most of the time, most countries muddle through, and markets compound upward over decades. Don't let hedging paranoia prevent you from capturing this base case scenario.
This is your boring, systematic wealth building. Index funds, broad diversification, dollar-cost averaging. Not exciting, but it captures the returns from humanity's general tendency to solve problems and create value over time.
Think of this as your "beta portfolio"—it gives you economic returns without requiring you to be particularly clever or lucky.
Leg 3: Build Your Own
This is where real alpha lives—both economically and existentially. Start companies. Create products. Write books. Build relationships. Develop skills. These active construction projects offer unlimited upside while giving you direct control over outcomes.
You're not just betting on other people's building; you're creating value yourself. This is where half my effort goes, and it's where the most potential economic return and personal satisfaction come from. It's first-order value capture, not the second-order returns from betting on others.
The building leg does double duty—it's both your highest expected return AND your source of meaning. You're not just optimizing a portfolio; you're creating reality.
Why This Works
Each leg serves the others:
Gold and silver protect your downside, letting you take bigger building risks
Diversified beta provides steady returns so you don't need your building projects to succeed immediately
Building creates the highest expected returns while generating personal meaning
The beautiful thing is this framework scales beyond investing:
Building a company? Hedge with stable income sources, capture industry growth through sector positioning, but focus most energy on your unique construction project.
Raising a family? Hedge with financial stability, capture societal benefits through community, but build your own family culture.
Creating art? Hedge with stable income, capture market trends, but focus on building your unique voice.
The Barbell of Building
Within the building leg itself, apply portfolio thinking. Consider a barbell approach:
One end: Very early stage investments with maximum convexity—high failure rate but exponential upside potential. This is where you back other builders whose vision aligns with yours.
Other end: Your own direct ventures where you have control and can apply the creative materialism principle directly.
Avoid the middle: Medium-risk, medium-return investments that neither provide safety nor offer transformational upside.
The Time Arbitrage
Each leg operates on different time horizons:
Gold & Silver: Insurance with no expiration date
Equities: 5-30 year compounding
Building: 2-10 year sprints with immediate feedback loops
This temporal diversity means you're never fully wrong or right at any given moment. When one time horizon disappoints, another often compensates. You're playing multiple games simultaneously.
Living the Framework
Remember from our first post: progress requires acute pain relative to your historic capacity. This framework ensures you're always experiencing productive dissonance:
When gold rallies 20% while equities tank: Your base case is wrong. The system is breaking. Good thing you hedged.
When equities soar and your hedges bleed: You're paying insurance premiums while everyone else parties. This is the hardest pain—watching others get rich while you "waste" money on protection.
When your startup implodes after 18 months: You just paid tuition at the university of reality. The lesson better be worth the price.
When something finally hits: One success pays for twenty failures. But only if you're still in the game.
You’re not trying to avoid pain—you’re structuring your portfolio so every kind of pain becomes tuition.
The Meta-Principle
What we're really talking about is becoming antifragile across multiple dimensions simultaneously. In a world of infinite complexity and radical uncertainty, you become stronger not by avoiding volatility, but by positioning to benefit from it.
The Romans had slaves whisper "memento mori" to victorious generals. Remember you will die. The modern version: Remember your models will break, your ventures will fail, and entropy always wins.
Now go build something anyway. Go make something. But build it as part of a portfolio that benefits whether you're right or wrong.
Bringing It All Together
This ending is much stronger, but I'd cut the numbered list entirely. It's the weakest part and interrupts the flow. Here's how it would read:
Bringing It All Together
Stoic Macro isn't just an investment strategy—it's a framework for navigating uncertainty.
You hedge the breakdown, capture the base case, and build your own future—knowing that meaning itself must be constructed, not discovered.
The math from our first post tells us we need acute pain to grow. This framework ensures it. The philosophy from our second post warns that models break. This framework profits when they do.
Look, entropy is going to win. You're going to die. Most of what you build will crumble. The market will humble you repeatedly. But that's precisely why this framework works—it assumes failure as the base case and positions for the few things that won't fail to matter enormously.
The ancient Stoics knew life was suffering. Modern traders know markets are chaos. We know both are true. The difference? We're not trying to escape either one. We've built a system that needs them both to function.
Pain without portfolio consciousness is just masochism. Portfolio consciousness without pain is just theory. Now go get hurt productively. Because together, pain and portfolio consciousness are how you build something real while the universe tries to tear it down.
Disclaimers
Leg 2, Diversified Beta, now carries more risk than you suggest, because it is driven by growing passive and systematic flows, and massive global imbalances, and massive domestic deficits and debt, that have accumulated over 40 years. The boat is leaning extremely to one side. Leg 1 and Leg 3 are not really adequate hedges for Leg 2. Leg 2 Exposure has to be hedged directly, or reduced.
The passive and systematic flows arguably are across all time horizons.
i.e. short term: systematic vol selling, vol targeting, stock buybacks,
medium term: portfolio rebalancing of target date funds to maintain 60:40 portfolios. the increasing private market share
long term: the passive bid for assets, buying indices, which decreases market elasticity as passive becomes the dominant share of the market.
The financial markets now determine the state of the real economy, rather than the real economy determining the state of the financial markets, so diversified beta has become a problematic position to hold at the same size when the real economy determined the financial market outcomes.
Otherwise, this three part series the Stoic Macro framework was exceptional.
I love this series a lot so I'm going to be f*n annoying and say that this part didn't feel like a direct conclusion/progression from the prior parts. This portfolio approach makes sense in general, but how does it build on the prior parts? where is the pain and reflection maximization?
Now maybe I just had too much to drink at brunch but would love the logical flow sharpened/clarified