Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gerald's avatar
18hEdited

Leg 2, Diversified Beta, now carries more risk than you suggest, because it is driven by growing passive and systematic flows, and massive global imbalances, and massive domestic deficits and debt, that have accumulated over 40 years. The boat is leaning extremely to one side. Leg 1 and Leg 3 are not really adequate hedges for Leg 2. Leg 2 Exposure has to be hedged directly, or reduced.

The passive and systematic flows arguably are across all time horizons.

i.e. short term: systematic vol selling, vol targeting, stock buybacks,

medium term: portfolio rebalancing of target date funds to maintain 60:40 portfolios. the increasing private market share

long term: the passive bid for assets, buying indices, which decreases market elasticity as passive becomes the dominant share of the market.

The financial markets now determine the state of the real economy, rather than the real economy determining the state of the financial markets, so diversified beta has become a problematic position to hold at the same size when the real economy determined the financial market outcomes.

Otherwise, this three part series the Stoic Macro framework was exceptional.

Expand full comment
bruce.n's avatar

I love this series a lot so I'm going to be f*n annoying and say that this part didn't feel like a direct conclusion/progression from the prior parts. This portfolio approach makes sense in general, but how does it build on the prior parts? where is the pain and reflection maximization?

Now maybe I just had too much to drink at brunch but would love the logical flow sharpened/clarified

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts